Showing posts with label self-fulfilling prophesies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label self-fulfilling prophesies. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

FORECASTING, FUTURISM AND UNCONVENTIONAL PREDICTORS

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .









FORECASTING AND FUTURISM: USING “UNCONVENTIONAL” INDICATORS
Should Unconventional Predictive Systems Be Used By Forecasters?
By Douglas E. Castle, From The Global Futurist Blog


In forecasting and in futurism, I believe that it is best not to exclude any predictive system or indicator, regardless of how unconventional or seemingly – superstitious, from consideration. What is likely a great deal more important is just how much weight to assign to each of these systems and indicators. Going one step further, the more of these systems that one uses (assuming that each is given appropriate consideration or “weight” due to its historical correlation with the actual occurrence of events) in a multivariate prediction model, the better the quality and reliability of the forecast.

In a configuration being used by a forecaster where there appears to be a confluence amongst a large number of these predictive systems, both scientific and anecdotal, the more likely the outcome and the validity of the particular event being forecast. Plainly speaking, when all of the indicators in all of these systems point in the same direction and at the same time, the greater the likelihood of a given event's occurrence. Let's call this Douglas E. Castle's Theory Of Predictive Confluence. I like the sound of it.

Given that most self-proclaimed “Futurists” [i.e., pundits, gurus and prophets – I'm grinning now...] base their predictions either upon an amalgamation of predictions made by other forecasters or trend-spotters, or upon a combination of the extrapolation of past trends and events in combination with some applied imagination, I refuse to rule any potentially predictive system “out” simply because it is associated with the seemingly supernatural or superstitious.

In the recent past, it has been repeatedly demonstrated that when a significant number of supposedly credible authoritative sources predict an event, especially in the capital markets, it tends to come true; this, to me, is less about prediction and more about a self-fulfilling prophesy based upon a “herd movement” mentality.

In the simplest example, if a large number of these authorities and experts are predicting a bank's imminent collapse (regardless of any real financial data to support the prediction), there will be a high probability of depositors running to the bank to withdraw their funds in order to place tham at a “safer” institution, and, if the bank's shares are traded on a public exchange, it is also highly probable that the market price of the shares will take a precipitous dive. In this case, the future was actually made, and not merely predicted because of the influence of the forecasters on the behavior of consumers and investors. This is a kind of “forced future.”

In my forecasting, I use a recipe comprised of these ingredients:

  1. An extrapolation based upon correlative history and an application of my imagination;
  2. A Prediction Equation based upon all types of systems, both conventional and unconventional; and
  3. A composite of the predictions of other notable and influential futurists.

In the past, I have found this recipe to be the best for both short-term and longer-term forecasts.

Enjoy the spectacle of the Blood Moon in particular, and more generally, open your mind to all predictive systems and indicators – they all exist, some for thousands of years, for a reason. I choose to keep an open mind and be receptive, as I believe every businessperson, investor and futurist should.

Douglas E. Castle

NOTE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS ARTICLE SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED BY THE READER AS BEING LEGAL, FINANCIAL, TAX, ACCOUNTING, ECONOMIC OR INVESTMENT ADVICE. NO OFFERING OF SECURITIES OR OTHER INVESTMENT INTERESTS OF ANY TYPE IN ANY ENTITY IS MADE HEREBY, NOR IS A SOLICITATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF SECURITIES OR OTHER INVESTMENT INTERESTS OF ANY TYPE IN ANY ENTITY MADE HEREBY. THIS ARTICLE IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND REPRESENTS THE VIEW OF THE AUTHOR ONLY.

THIS ARTICLE IS COPYRIGHT 2014 BY DOUGLAS E. CASTLE, WITH ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ANY REPRODUCTION, TRANSMITTAL OR DISTRIBUTION OF THIS ARTICLE, EITHER IN WHOLE OR PART, IS UNAUTHORIZED AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL, UNLESS FULL ATTRIBUTION IS GIVEN TO THE AUTHOR AND ALL LINKS IN THE ARTICLE REMAIN INCLUDED AND “LIVE.”

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Mandarin Madness: Self-Fulfilling Prophesy

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



As is the case in many trends and their ultimate outcomes, a strong perception of the "inevitable future" becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy. Put succinctly, the belief becomes the truth because our actions in response to that belief make it so. The anticipated domination of  China in both the consumer and producer sectors has led to an increase in the number of students in industrialized nations who are learning to speak Mandarin. This is being encouraged by adding this language to the elective studies in high schools and colleges, and further fed by employment statisticians, economists and even professional and industry management recruiters who are preparing the next class of graduates for jobs where speaking Mandarin will give them the "edge."

It is also interesting that this phenomenon once applied to learning to speak Japanese in the late 1970s and in the 1980s in the United States, but to a smaller extent in terms of schools offering the elective and the number of students (as a percentage of total students) choosing to study.

The likely reasons that this newer wave of linguistic leaning is so much greater in proliferation and participation that the earlier one (i.e., learning to speak Japanese) are listed below:

1) The media are constantly speaking of China's inevitable rise to dominance, and the viralized potency of the new social media echoing this point did not exist during the "Japanese Period.";

2) There is less resistance to the idea than previously because their has been an increasing contingent of Asian-Americans and Asian-Europeans during the most recent 20-year span of time. This has had the secondary effect of infusing Chinese culture (and partially-Chinese offspring) into these countries with far more pervasive immigration than ever in history;

3) Unemployment is so intimidatingly high in the Western countries, that learning Mandarin is seen as a survival skill as well as a competitive advantage in accessing employment at the increased number of large firms which are multinationals and internationals. The increase in the number of major firms which are multicultural is simply the result of an increasingly globalized economy brought about through improved efficiencies in communications technology, an ever-increasing number of multi-national co-ventures;

4) University tuition has become so expensive (relative to the rise in cost of many other traditional family staples), that colleges and universities are trying to cater to the increasing market for students who want to be International Business majors. Colleges need tuition revenues from enrolled and matriculating students in order to survive in a very "dry" economy;

5) Referring back to point number 1), above, even articles like this one, with its catchy title (I am rather proud of it), are being amplified and reverberated throughout cyberspace by social media. In merely writing this article, I am contributing an increment of increased momentum and credibility to this Mandarin Madness.

An excerpt from an article which discusses this new international trendency (not a misspelling, but a Lingovation). It further validates the emerging interest in the perceived opportunities in the business of Planetary Geographical Arbitrage as it applies to both education and employment.

Remember this: "We shape the future by our reactions to anticipated visions of the future." 

Douglas E Castle
---------------

Learning Mandarin gains momentum in European, US classrooms
Gains in China's economic standing also have brought about a greater desire for children in the United States and Europe to speak Mandarin, which is supplanting Spanish and German as the second tongue of choice in some schools. More than 3% of American elementary schools offer the language, a large increase considering less than 1% did during the 1990s. "One way or another, China is the future," said Olaf Mertens, a school headmaster in Belgium. The Globe and Mail (Toronto)/Financial Times (17 Oct.)

--------------- 


Blogs And RSS Feeds
by Douglas E Castle


Friday, June 19, 2009

Determinism - Tough Questions

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



FROM: The Global Futurist - "Determinism - Tough Questions"

Dear Friends:

Sometimes it seems as if all of the future were predetermined by a force or forces beyond the scope of our control. Are we wasting our time trying to change things...or can we genuinely create constructive change and truly shape our own destinies?


Just as curiously, do we permit the future to "run its course" by the self-fulfilling prophesy associated with believing that the future is predetermined? An example, culled from real life:

If I do not believe that my vote will make a difference, and I therefore choose not to cast any vote, am I acknowledging the inevitable, or am I passively creating an outcome? Is it possible that those other prospective voters who do not feel as I do ultimately gain the power (by their participation in the voting process) to shape the future? By my failure to vote, am I decreasing my ability to write the script to my future, and empowering the voting population to write the script for me?


Just what effect do we (and can we) have on the future? What effect, if any, do our belief systems have on our ability to shape the future?


Pause for a moment, just to think about these matters.


Faithfully,


Douglas Castle


Thursday, November 20, 2008

WHEN ANTICIPATION BECOMES REALITY: THE SELF-FULFILLING PROPHESY

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



Dear Friends:

Our actions of today are led by our anticipations about tomorrow. Stated in another way, thinking about the future shapes the present moment. If we anticipate peace and prosperity, we conduct ourselves in one way -- if we perceive a bleak future of war and economic collapse, we act accordingly. This recurring theme of the self-fulfilling prophesy in human affairs is fascinating as well as frightening. Masterful leaders and statesmen have learned to harness the powerful nature of this phenomenon in order to triumph in elections, to get legislation passed, to initiate social transformation and religious movements, and, of course, to start wars.

This phenomenon is culturally and technologically engrained into the capital markets, where traders, anticipating a price increase (for example, the price per barrel of crude oil), actually bid up the price by their pre-emptive action; or where the public, anticipating the precipitous financial decline of a company or industry, stop investing in the company or industry's securities, and stop buying its products and services as well. In theory, a good rumor, spread rapidly and across a large segment of the population, can be turned into fact. Our perceptions become our reality. The fans of theosophy and esoteric studies believe that this is an outgrowth of or a corollary to The Law Of Attraction. They may well be right.

A recent article from THE NEW YORK TIMES follows, by way of example:
####


Markets Dive in Last Hour, Carving New Lows
By JACK HEALY
Published: November 19, 2008

Wall Street doubled down on its losses on Thursday, just a day after financial markets closed at their lowest point in nearly six years.

In a day dominated by fear and uncertainty, financial markets plunged in late trading, carving new lows, after spending much of the day bobbing between positive and negative territory. The Dow Jones industrial average was 444.99 points or 5.5 percent lower Thursday afternoon at the close. The wider Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index was down 54.14 points or 6.7 percent, adding to its losses after tumbling 6 percent on Wednesday. The Nasdaq fell 5 percent.
As stocks hopped from red to green and back again, investors continued to seek cover in safe havens like Treasury notes and gold, driving those prices higher. And a new report that jobless claims had crested to their highest levels in 16 years reminded investors that the frail economy continues to weaken.
“We think it’s going to continue to go lower,” said Ryan Detrick of Schaeffer’s Investment Research. “We don’t think people are scared enough. They’re just not showing enough fear. People are numb to this, they’re almost immune to it.”
On Thursday, the Labor Department reported that new claims for unemployment benefits rose to a seasonally adjusted 542,000 last week, the highest level since July 1992. On Capitol Hill, the Senate was expected to take up a bill extending unemployment assistance to people whose benefits have expired.
Economists said the swelling jobless numbers were creating a vicious circle between Wall Street’s losses and the afflictions of the broader economy.
“The profit drag on corporate America is widening and deepening, and this is leading to more layoffs and cutbacks in capital spending, which is extending and deepening the recession,” said Stuart Schweitzer, global markets strategist for J.P. Morgan Private Bank. “We’ve gotten into a full-blown, self-feeding downturn.”

Financial shares, which took the brunt of Wednesday’s losses, continued their bad streak on Thursday. Citigroup fell by double digits for a second day, to less than $5 a share, despite news that Prince al-Walid bin Talal of Saudi Arabia was increasing his stake in the troubled banking giant to 5 percent. Banks from Wells Fargo to Bank of America to JPMorgan Chase were all down in afternoon trading.
Shares in America’s two largest automakers were mixed after Congressional leaders said any proposal to bail out the auto industry would fail if it were put to a vote this week. Democratic leaders from the House and Senate criticized the executives of Ford, Chrysler and General Motors, and said the automakers needed to make a more persuasive case that they would be responsible stewards of $25 billion in federal aid. Shares of G.M. were up slightly while Ford was lower.

Investors sold off early Wednesday after confronting data that showed an unexpectedly large drop in consumer prices, which suggested deflation could become the newest problem for policy makers. The Dow fell more than 5 percent Wednesday while the Nasdaq fell more than 6 percent.

“The problem is there is absolutely no silver lining visible,” said Arjuna Mahendran, head of Asian investment strategy at HSBC Private Bank in Singapore. “The financial crisis may now be at its tail end and we are now in a second phase where corporate distress is the key issue. A third phase may come early next year, when emerging markets will really struggle as the crisis widens and exports continue to shrink.”

Oil prices slipped below $50 a barrel, settling at $49.62 a barrel, down 7 percent.
In Europe, the Dow Jones Euro Stoxx 50 index, a barometer of euro zone blue chips, closed down 3 percent, while the FTSE 100 index in London was down 3.2 percent. The CAC 40 in Paris declined 3.4 percent, and the DAX in Frankfurt 3 percent. In Moscow, the Micex exchange halted trading for one hour after shares fell 7.6 percent.

Credit markets remained tight. The so-called Ted spread, the gap between yields on safe three-month United States government securities and the rate that banks charge one another for loans of the same duration, was unchanged at 2.11 percentage points. The spread is well down from its peak of 4.6 points on Oct. 10, but the improvement in the credit markets has stalled over the last two weeks. Analysts consider a level of 0.5 point to 1.0 point to be normal.
Asian markets stumbled badly. The Tokyo benchmark Nikkei 225 stock average finished 6.9 percent lower, taking its loss to the year to nearly 50 percent. Government data Thursday showed Japanese exports were down 7.7 percent in October from a year earlier, the steepest decline since December 2001. The drop contributed to Japan’s $665.8 million trade deficit.
While a drop had been expected — overseas consumers have long been cutting down on spending, and the yen’s strength against other currencies makes Japanese goods more expensive overseas — the amount of the decline does not bode well for the wider economy.
The Hang Seng in Hong Kong closed down 5.2 percent, and the Shanghai Stock Exchange composite index fell 1.7 percent.

In Sydney, the S&P/ASX in Sydney dropped 4.2 percent. The index was dragged down by the giant mining companies BHP Billiton, which fell 9.1 percent, and Rio Tinto, which plunged 13.1 percent. Like other raw materials companies, they have been affected by worries that the global downturn will damp demand.

On Wednesday, the German chemical conglomerate BASF said it would cut global production by as much as 25 percent because demand from automakers, textile companies and the construction industry dried up.

Bettina Wassener and David Jolly contributed reporting.
what's this?
'08 Stock Market Crash isonly the beginning of troubles for America, leading to it's demise.http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=B3XI2ENclSb_7OY6Ga46ltM8ItvCBggHIvPHnBMCNtwHQ6AwQARgBIJzz-AEoAzgAUJrpvLb4_____wFgyf6Ni8Ck2A-yAQ93d3cubnl0aW1lcy5jb23IAQHaATlodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm55dGltZXMuY29tLzIwMDgvMTEvMjEvYnVzaW5lc3MvMjFtYXJrZXRzLmh0bWyAAgGoAwHoA2voAxDoA4gE9QMCBAAA9QMkAAAAmAQA&num=1&ggladgrp=6685177097070542627&gglcreat=10102112370385088338&adurl=http://the-end.com/2008GodsFinalWitness/&client=ca-nytimes_article_var
FDIC Watch List117 Banks On This FDIC List. Is Your Bank? Read Our Free Report.SovereignSociety.com/Market_Crisis
Diversifying Your IRAAlternatives available within your IRA. Another option to stocks.http://www.firstfidelityreserve.com/


####

It is important to know that the recent events in the economy do not reflect a sudden downturn at all -- these inefficiencies, abuses and areas of neglect have been going on for years -- it is simply that the news of these problems has come to light. This bad news (i.e., a poor economic report card) initiated the negative response which we see reflected in the economy.

Think about this: A bank will keep on loaning your company money until it hears that you might not continue to be creditworthy (even if this last is merely an ill-intended rumor leaked by some naysayer or detractor) -- then, it will take anticipatory action and stop making further loans. In fact, it might even declare all of your outstanding loans immediately due, creating an immediate crisis in your company.

A rumor can cause a run on the banks. A rumor can cause the destruction of virtually anything Human-made. Propaganda and news control are powerful weapons. And we base our present reality upon a supposed future. Dreams, either good or bad, might well come true, depending upon whether or not we act on them.

Philosophically (or perhaps metaphysically), there is no present: there is only the past and the anticipated future, which makes the present inconsequential.

The next time that a well-intended friend admonishes you for your depression or malaise and reminds you to "live in the present," simply tell him or her that preparing for the future has stolen your present from you.
Oh...and about the economy -- it will magically rebound as soon as people begin to believe that it has hit bottom and that it is ready to rebound.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle

p.s. Please take a moment and view my new blog at http://aboutdouglascastle.blogspot.com/. Let me know your thoughts!

KEYWORDS, TERMS AND ORGANIZATIONS:

globalism, CFR, NGO, UN, WTO, IMF, central bank, outsourcing, offshoring, capital markets, import, export, international trade, strategic alliances, e-commerce, entrepreneurship, social networking, banking, finance, trade, ventures, business, securities, stock exchanges, indexes, futurism, trends, citizen ambassadorship, enterprise, capitalism, international politics, commodities, prime rate, LIBOR, foreign currencies, foreign exchange, blogs, blogging, bloggers, aol, google, yahoo, msn, AP, news, media alerts, world government, world governments, international affairs, treaties, tariffs, trade restrictions, marketing, advertising, business development, arbitrage, obtaining capital, promotion, publicity, EU, NATO, military affairs, government regulation, trade restrictions, liquidity crisis, business opportunities, web-based businesses, communication, communications, technology, intelligence, embassies, consulates, business resources, Douglas Castle,The Internationalist Page, The Global Futurist, international politics, elections, time management, cyberspace, AI, energy, industry, productivity, Mixx, Digg, Technorati, Sphere, Facebook, YouTube, MySpace, LinkedIn, advertising, economics, strategy, management, cooperation, widgets, blidgets, links, incoterms, CCH, UCC, freight forwarding, custom house brokers, diversity, employment, culture, micro-loans, technological convergence, trends, financial planning, FOREX, futures, stock index, inflation, recession, sub-contracting, Department of Commerce, CIOF, the next generation, amnesty, humanitarianism, foreign aid, philanthropy, charity, LinkedIn, singularity, transportation, IT, intelligence, complexity theory, energy sources, shortages, climatic change, pop-culture, survivalism, mergers and acquisitions
...

Friday, December 28, 2007

THE IRONY OF POLLS

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



Dear Friends:



We are all too familiar with the notion of the self-fulfilling prophesy -- a fascinating psychological phenomenon (used here in the negative context) whereby we are gripped by a fearful anticipation to such a great extent that we subconsciously help to make it come to fruition through our defensive responses and our instinctual, reflexive behavior.

Extrapolating and philosophizing just a bit (simultaneously!), it might be said that the future will be just as wonderful or just as horrific as we imagine that it will be.

In Bruce Klein's NOVAMENTE blog (there is a link to his blog in the Links section of this one), Bruce cites the top 10 Existential Risks, and asks, indirectly, that we prioritize which ones we would rate as the most important/ worrisome by how much money (based upon a theoretical total budget of $100 million) we would choose to allocate to researching each of them. Simply: the greater the perceived threat, the more money we would be willing to apportion to researching it. It is presented as a poll, and I look forward to seeing the results.

The risks, unranked, but ordered in the construction matrix of the poll, are listed below:

BIOLOGICAL (viruses, etc.)
SPACE THREATS (asteroids, etc.)
ENVIRONMENTAL (global warming, etc.)
EXTRATERRESTRIAL (invasion, etc.)
NANOTECHNOLOGY (gray goo, etc.)
NUCLEAR (holocaust, etc.)
GOVERNMENTS (abusive power, etc.)
SIMULATION SHUT DOWN (assumes we live in one, etc.)
SUPERINTELLIGENT AI (unfriendly, etc.)
OTHER:________________

There are several statistical biases inherent in this type of a poll that emerge from a confusing confluence of two effects -- the actual nature of how the question is framed (e.g., the manner in which you ask a question, or request an answer), and human nature, with its idiosycracies and encultured conformities.

A brief look at some of these interesting bias points:

1. The assumption that all of the risks presented are truly the "Top Ten", or at least the "Top Nine" and a write-in.

2. The inclination by many prospective respondents to inherently view the likelihood or severity of the risks in a declining order, with the most dangerous being first on the list. We all have a tendency to do this, by the way.

3. The implicit tendency to assume that the more money we allocate to studying a problem, the more likely it is to be solved. <"We need your donations to find a cure!">

4. The implicit understanding that any study, in fact, can or will yield a solution of some sort...or even have any effect on the possibility of preventing the occurrence of some disaster, or, at least, mitigating the damage that it wreaks.

5. The natural propensity to mitigate or "hedge" answers, by a kind of diversification. Simply put, if I truly believe (for the sake of illustration) that ENVIRONMENTAL risks (either Global Warming, or having to listen to Al Gore lecture about Global Warming) are the only ones which we can proactively short-circuit via research, I will still not put all of the $100 million into the ENVIRONMENTAL category; I will spread that money around a bit, because I have been indoctrinated with the cultural paradigm that diversification = safety.

I would suggest that you visit Bruce's blog, and participate in the poll. I think that simply designing a poll which yields metrics undistorted by "human nature error" is something worth studying, too.

One final observation about the poll, or about any poll, is that if the category OTHER is given as an alternative, many respondents will allocate some of the $100 million to that category automatically, because they are subconsciously trying to address an ingrained perception that we are always "leaving something out". OTHER becomes the "just in case..." hedge. Not unlike when you jiggle the mailbox chute, or check your doorknob, or look behind you to be certain that your car's lights are off.

I wonder if there is a way to segregate people's actual thoughts from the way in which they express them when confronted with a poll format.

************************************************

Now, to the business of The Global Futurist. We are going to be seeing more of the following:

1. Decisions, both in business and in politics being made by the use of public polls.

2. Polls being used as a propagandist tool to incite concern, fear, or to simply divert attention away from other issues or actions.

3. Polls as the primary horsemen of the self-fulfilling prophesy.

4. Increased reliance on polling and a corresponding decreased reliance on expertise.

5. Published polling results supplanting creative thought and innovation.


Keep watching. On a serious note, it causes me a feeling of impending loss when I think of the possibility that people may ultimately wait for poll results before they formulate opinions of their own. Perhaps we might consider spending some of Bruce's hypothetical $100 million on ways to preserve spontaneity and originality.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle

911













Blog Archive

Bookmark and Share