Showing posts with label oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oil. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

US Oil Addiction: Deadly Denial

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .







The Global Futurist Blog is predicting that The US' addiction to oil is going to persist, and will probably increase during the next fifteen- to twenty-year time horizon. This is not for lack of interest in alternative forms of energy, or for any lack of existing (or currently developing) substitutes or supplements to oil - it will primarily be due to Big Oil's increasing aggressiveness in domestic oil extraction under the patriotic guise of "oil independence" from middle eastern sources of supply -- who are constantly blamed (scapegoating) for the high price and limited availability of oil and gasoline at the pump. This doesn't solve any real problem. The true source of supply and pricing problems is right here in the US.

The aggressive extraction and production of fossil fuels in the US will only slow down when either 1) there is no longer any petroleum to be extracted [i.e., that our geological reserves are completely exhausted] or 2) the US population actually reduces its demand for automobile travel, oil heat and other refinery products. Neither is likely within the next twenty years. By manipulating supply and periodically dropping prices (only to have them rise during various crises, and then to fall again to new "higher lows"), the domestic oil oligopoly will continue to keep the dependency on oil high.

In the shorter-term (during 2013 -2014), oil and petroleum prices are certain to drop; the oil producers do not want to kill off their addicts -- they merely want them hooked.  And to make the oil companies' strategy all the more effective, the addicts in this instance are in denial.

The article excerpt which follows is excellent evidence of what I've stated above. The piece should be read both on its face and "between the lines."

IEA: U.S. will be biggest oil producer by 2020
The U.S. will replace Saudi Arabia as the top oil producer by 2020, the International Energy Agency said in a report. Around 2030, the U.S. will become a net exporter of oil and by 2035, it will be almost entirely energy self-sufficient, the agency said. Los Angeles Times (tiered subscription model) (11/13), Houston Chronicle/Loren Steffy blog (11/12), Business Insider (11/12)

####

Celebrating our oil independence from foreign sources is as ludicrous as throwing a party because we have found a more resourceful and industrious heroin supplier closer to our street in a better part of town. It is not something to celebrate about.

The US addiction to oil is not based upon where it comes from -- it is based upon the deeply ingrained consumer philosophy that "cheaper gasoline" is a good thing. The good thing would be a change in the dynamic among automakers, the oil companies and the consumers whereby the consumers would demand an alternative to gasoline instead of topping off the tank whenever the price is a bit lower and the supply appears plentiful.

This will slow down the development, proliferation and acceptance of alternative energy sources and technologies because it will cause an already oil-addicted nation to abandon its recovery attempts and simultaneously drive them (no pun intended) into perpetuating an already dangerous dependency upon oil and to a loss of inspired focus on finding a means of breaking free of the stranglehold that the oil companies have on consumers.

The principal enemy is consumer demand and an incredibly short public memory.

Alternative energy has been gaining a foothold in the US, and the parties involved in its production and acceptance (as an alternative to oil) will have to aggressively step up their marketing efforts and focus more on the threat level posed by the forecast increasing supply of oil.

I believe that the only good news here is that the US may 1) be able to accelerate an economic recovery by (at least temporarily) reducing the price of oil and the oil-related costs which impact the market pricing of so many goods, and 2) be able to export oil to other nations and thereby reduce of growing trade and budget deficits to the benefit of the US' sovereign debt standing.

And yes, oil prices will drop in 2013 for all of the eager US consumers.

Thank you as always for reading me




View DOUGLAS E. CASTLE's profile on LinkedIn

Douglas E Castle
All Blogs & RSS Feeds

Share this page
Contact Douglas Castle
Follow Me on Pinterest






Wednesday, November 7, 2007

OIL - THE NEW CURRENCY OF CHOICE?

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



Dear Friends:



As of the date of this post, oil prices are hovering at close to $100 per barrel. All products and services which require transportation as part of the delivery process are being forced to endure higher transportation costs, which are, as is customary, being passed along to the consumer. The world economy is still quite oil dependent. The capital markets, the securities exchanges, and many other indicators of economic stability and strength are showing the strain.

With the Chinese and numerous other oil-producing nations loudly rattling their sabers about the prospect of accepting other currencies (and perhaps even excluding the U.S. Dollar) in exchange for their oil, this bodes poorly for the value of the U.S. Dollar. While it bodes somewhat better in the shorter term for the Euro and some other currencies which compete with the U.S. Dollar, the ultimate effect will be the creation of uncertainty at the capriciousness of the oil-producing and exporting countries, and a net devaluation of all currencies in a rush for currency diversification among oil purchasers eager to hedge their bets.

Anticipate the rise to prominence of several types of products during the course of these next 24 months:

1. A spate of oil hedge contracts and other pre-emptive cost insurances;

2. A spate of currency de-valuation insurance products;

3. An upsurge in the type, number and volume of diversified currency funds and fund products available in the U.S. and elsewhere;

4. An upsurge in the prices of shares in publicly-traded "alternative energy" stocks worldwide;

5. Some token tax and other economic incentives to be promulgated by the US Government to encourage the development of alternatives to fossil fuels;

6. An increasing number of exporters (into the U.S.) unwilling to accept the U.S. Dollar as a preferred form of payment;

7. A number of innovative financial instruments which are not only backed by, but which are denominated in gallons or barrels of oil;

8. A worldwide revisitation of the notion of barter.

9. Escalating hostilities between nations which are net producers of oil and those nations which are net consumers of oil. Veiled threats couched in overtures at compromise. Ironically, this exercise will be noisy but relatively ineffective for several simple reasons, including the facts that: A) Too many unholy alliances exist between multinational companies in both camps; B) Too many net consumers of oil are also heavily invested in oil as an asset and a store of value; C) The wide-scale use of any viable, and useable substitute for fossil fuels is likely quite far off in the future (due to the preceding conflicts, and many other reasons, as is so often the case when so many parties are more deeply invested in the problem than any true solution).

BLACK GOLD? I THINK SO.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle

p.s. Should I fill my gas tank or pay my mortgage? Perhaps I should simply consolidate, and live in my car.

Blog Archive

Bookmark and Share